harmony with
in
the Government, is not in the conditions stipulated in the Grant in his Scheme and go so far beyond it in stringency that it will be impossible for him to accept the Grant
unless the conditions Contained in the
proposed declaration be modifieds
3.
I also enclose the Declaration of Trust and Memorial referred to
beg
and
that these two documents
be eventually returned to Mr Leysch either through the Crown Attorney
or through myself.
4.
The objections which Mr. Leysch
raises appear to me well founded.
I believe that
20
Educational Agency
in
the Colony would ever accept a Building Grant
set under the conditions
here proposed without material modifications.
5.
The objections raised by Leysch
are moreover in principle identical with those raised by Bishop Raimondi in 1884, which were referred to the Secretary of State. The decision
given in that case was never communicated to me, but I believe the Bishop's objection on the whole considered valid and a building grant of $6,000 or more was made, without a formal Declaration of Trust such as
that now proposed being required of the Bishop. Looking upon the case of Bishop Raimondi
6.
as on the whole
one and considering
an
exceptional Wish
that hereafter
other
applications for Building Grant will from time to time, I think
be made
it very desirable that a
form of Declaration of Trust be adopted by the Government
in all
future
as a model to be used
for general guidance in dealing with the varied special circumstances of each application.
in
of each application. I therefore hail with pleasure the fact that the Crown Attorney has drawn up such a form, although it will
require
harmony with
in
the Government, is not in the conditions stipulated in the Grant in hid Scheme and gow so far beyond it in stringency that it will be imposible for him to accept the Grant
unless the conditions Contained in the
propoed declaration be modifieds
3.
I also enclose the Declaration of Trust and Memorial referred to
beg
and
that these two documents
be eventually returned to Mr Leysch either through the Crown Attorney
through myself.
4.
The objections which Mr. Seusch
recise appear to me well formeded.
believe that
20
Educational Agency
in
the Colony would ever cexcept a - Building Grant
et under the conditions
here proposed without material) modifications .
5.
Keusch
We
The objections prized by attr
are morcover in principle identical with those raised by Bishop
Raimonds
C
wven
560
referred
Raimondi in 1884, which a to the Secretary of State . The decision
tvene
in that case was rever communicated to me, but I believe the Bishop's objection on the whole considered -valid and a building grant of $6,000. or more was made, without a formal Ceclanation of Fruct such as
that now proposed being required of the Bishop. Looking upon the case of Rich of
6.
Raimondi
as on the whole
one and considering
an
Wish
exceptional.
that hereafter
other
applications for Building Crank will from time to time, Ithink.
be made
it very desirable that a
~ for of Reclaration of Trust be adopted by the Governene.
in all
rent
all future
as a model to be used
گھر
for general guidance in dealing with the varied special circumstances of each application.
in
of each application. I therefore hail with pleasure the fast that the Crown Attorney has drawn -up euch a form, although it will
a
Require
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.